Date of Award
12-2018
Document Type
Thesis
Degree Name
Master of Science (MS)
Department
Behavioral Analysis
First Advisor
David A. Wilder
Second Advisor
Nicholas L. Weatherly
Third Advisor
John E. Deaton
Fourth Advisor
Nicole E. Gravina
Abstract
This study evaluated the utility of the Performance Diagnostic Checklist- Safety (PDC-Safety) (Martinez-Onstott, Wilder, & Sigurdsson, 2016) by comparing the effectiveness of a PDC-Safety indicated intervention with a PDC-Safety nonindicated intervention. The interventions targeted participants’ hand washing behavior at a clinic serving children with intellectual disabilities. Failure to wash hands at appropriate times could pose health risks to both behavior technicians and clients, so efforts should be made to increase the likelihood of hand washing. The results of the PDC-Safety suggested that the antecedents and information domain was most problematic. First, a non-indicated intervention, which included access to additional materials (i.e., hand sanitizer), was implemented and found to be ineffective. Next, an indicated intervention, which included prompting, was evaluated and found to be effective to increase safe performance for three of the four participants; two participants required feedback to maintain safe performance.
Recommended Citation
Cruz, Nelmar Jacinto, "Are We Safe Yet? Re-evaluation of the Performance Diagnostic Checklist-Safety (PDC-Safety)" (2018). Theses and Dissertations. 115.
https://repository.fit.edu/etd/115
Comments
Copyright held by author.