Date of Award
5-2023
Document Type
Dissertation
Degree Name
Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)
Department
Psychology
First Advisor
Gary N. Burns
Second Advisor
Jessica L. Wildman
Third Advisor
Patrick D. Converse
Fourth Advisor
Kimberly N. Sloman
Abstract
360-degree feedback systems are some of the most widely used ratings systems in organizations today. The current study examined the use of 360-degree feedback systems as a method for capturing job performance in organizations and the challenges associated with accuracy in ratings due to individual differences in perception. The study investigated the links between self-other rating tendencies and narrow facets of personality and examined how an individual’s personality affects self- and other-ratings of their performance behaviors. The findings suggest that various aspects of personality differentially affect both self- and other-ratings of performance, providing a deeper understanding of how individual differences such as personality affect ratings of performance from multiple perspectives, including rating source, self-enhancement, self-verification, and self-presentation. The study highlights the importance of applying appropriate methods to study the prediction of self-other agreement and the need to revisit current theories of self-other agreement to consider the complex multivariate links of how personality interacts with perceptions of behavior.
Recommended Citation
Miller, Robert Allen, "Exploring Factors that Influence Disagreements in Self-Other Ratings in 360-Degree Feedback Systems" (2023). Theses and Dissertations. 1252.
https://repository.fit.edu/etd/1252